Anti 'Racist' Groups Threaten Election Process

The leader of the French Front National Mr Jean Marie Le Pen has been acquitted of ‘racism’ charges after far-left anti-racism group SOS Racism had accused Le Pen of inciting racial hatred.

Their aim was to imprison the 82 year old leader, illustrating the fact that unelected third party groups like SOS Racism and Searchlight are threatening the democratic process by bullying, intimidation and threats of violence.

The French case was heard earlier this week and related to the FN election campaign "No to Islamism" which featured a woman in a black face-covering Muslim veil next to a map of France covered in the Algerian flag.

SOS Racism did not like campaign material issued by the FN and they attempted to have its leader imprisoned.

This closely parallels the undemocratic attempts to imprison our own Chairman Nick Griffin on many occasions.

SOS Racism has spearheaded a campaign to deliberately force employers into accepting more minorities into their workforces. The SOS Racism campaign involves sending two identical work applications to a prospective employer. One application with a name of French origin and the other an immigrant name. This bullying strategy has led to many law suits for racial discrimination against employers in France.

SOS Racism is in many ways a parallel to the anti-democratic third party group Searchlight in the UK. Like Searchlight, SOS interferes with the electoral democratic process by deliberately swamping the electorate with publications that spew outright lies about candidates.

The SOS group also has major ties to the PS Socialist Party, again mirroring Searchlights close relationship with the Labour Party in the UK.
Searchlight is a far left, Zionist funded organisation that interferes in the democratic election process.

Political parties are bound by tight spending regulations on what a political party can and cannot spend during an election. Searchlight is not bound by these rules and they swamp wards and constituencies with outright lies against British National Party (BNP) candidates with no accountability or spending cap.

To this day the funding of Searchlight remains unknown. Political parties are regulated by law and have to publish the details of any significant funding/donor income. Searchlight can interfere in the election process, spend what they desire with no cap, and still not have to account for their income even though they directly interfere in the election process.

United Against Fascism (UAF) who have extremely close ties with Searchlight have been involved in organised violence against BNP members, including attacks on a BNP members property and a claw hammer attack. Many of its activists have been arrested by the Police.

The BNP would like to ask the Electoral Commission why third party groups like Searchlight are tolerated with no accountability whatsoever, but are allowed to campaign in election contests without a cap on spending, the need to explain their funding sources or justify the outright falsehoods they spread.