. David Hannam - Musings, Thoughts and an Ethno-Nationalist Perspective: 2010

Friday, 17 December 2010

European Union Helps Everyone Except the UK

As British National Party MEP’s voted this week in the European Parliament, the BNP renewed its call for withdrawal from the European Union (EU) as more UK money is being used to fund poor, developing and third world countries whilst UK industry suffers terminal decline and massive redundancies.

The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) is an EU body which administers a budget of €500m and its purpose is to help people suffering from being made unemployed and help them to reintegrate into the labour market.

According to the EU, the EGF was “created in order to provide additional assistance to workers suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns.”

In other words, due to the failed policies of globalisation many European countries face massive outsourcing of European jobs to third world countries as European workers could not compete with the low wage standard in the third world.

Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Austria, and even the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) as recognised by the EU have all benefited from the EGF.

Recently, EU MEP’s voted on The Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) in a motion whereby it was proposed that European and inevitably UK money will be used to prop up third world economies by investing €200 million to 10 third world ACP countries for four years.

In contrast, Britain has not received one penny from the EGF, though substantial portions of the EGF is funded from British taxpayers’ money.

As of this week, MEP’s, including our own BNP MEP’s voted on the following proposals to help other states who are suffering from redundancies forced by the failings of globalisation.

These include:

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in ICT wholesale trade in the Netherlands

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in diesel engine manufacturing in Poland

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the automotive sector in Spain

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the automotive industry in Poland

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in retail trade in Spain

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the textile sector in Spain

• Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: redundancies in the manufacture of natural stone products in Spain

If passed, these states will all benefit from financial help.

Britain is also facing a massive decline in industry and has suffered a high number of redundancies. The BNP believes that British taxpayers’ money should be used to help alleviate the hardships our own industries instead of being used to help others.

As an example:

• The UK wholesale energy industry is facing criticism of its pricing policies. Three companies – British Gas, ScottishPower and Scottish & Southern have all increased prices, hitting our elderly at a time we are facing one of the harshest winters in decades. We believe that any portion of UK money currently sat in EU coffers should be reinvested back into helping our own wholesale trade industry, perhaps the energy industry in particular in order to lower energy prices.

• Manufacturing industry. Considering the recent depreciation of sterling, which helps to promote UK exports, we feel it would be wiser to reinvest UK funds back into the UK manufacturing industry. According to Confederation of British Industry (CBI) monthly Industrial Trends survey for December, a balance of 4 per cent more employers reported export orders being above normal rather than below it. With sterling currently weakening, we should reinvest UK funds currently sat in EU coffers back into our recovering export manufacturing industry.

• Automotive industry. In 2008 the automotive manufacturing sector employed more than 163,000 people but two years later it was down to 116,000 - that's a 28 per cent cut according Prof. Garel Rhys, chairman of Welsh Automotive Forum. We believe that UK funds should be reinvested back into the UK automotive industry.

• Retail trade industry. According to a recent report by The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) the recession has claimed over 6,000 insolvencies in the UK. We recommend that any UK portion of EU funds should be reinvested into helping those affected by insolvency.

• Textile industry. According to Co-operatives UK, a national trade body, textile jobs in Britain are lost at rate of one per hour. We say invest our portion of UK money residing in the EU back into helping our own textile industry

Naturally, none of these UK industries will receive any help whatsoever from the EGF.

It is important to make the point that the BNP does not oppose help being given to fellow Europeans hit by the failed policies of economic globalisation and the inevitable outsourcing of jobs to the third world, we only oppose UK taxpayers’ money being used for any other use than its reinvestment back into Britain.

The BNP believes that Britain should withdraw completely from the EU to ensure that all British taxpayers’ money is used solely for the benefit of British interests.

David Hannam is a political adviser to Nick Griffin MEP.

Thursday, 16 December 2010

Great Strides Forward

Quick post, apologies to those who asked why the lack of posts.

Over the last four days I have been working with a team dedicated to improving our campaigning techniques.

Some very positive and groundbreaking structure has been put into place.

Thursday, 9 December 2010

U.S. On Course to Become Minority White as New Immigration Amnesty Bill is Passed

The House of Representatives has passed an immigration reform bill which, if approved by that country's senate, will legitimise vast numbers of illegal immigrants in America and will open that country to a general "back door amnesty" for millions more.

The law, dubbed the ‘Dream Act,’ aims to provide amnesty to the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of young illegal immigrants — if they attend college or join the military.

Incredibly, it has been revealed that even if illegal immigrants have committed serious crimes such as assault, sexual abuse, reckless driving, fraud and domestic violence, they would still qualify for legal status under the reform bill.

Support for the reform bill is widely considered to be a cynical attempt from Democrats and some Republicans to appeal to the growing Hispanic and non-white vote in the U.S.

U.S. white citizens would now face more competition from newly legalised immigrants in college admissions, federal loans, work-study programs and the workforce.

All of this would result in whites failing to take educational seats, loan rejections to pay for education, reduce their chances of participating in work-study programs and cause unemployment amongst whites as immigrants are pushed into employment.

Many employers are now faced to take part in the ‘quota hire’ system, which is essentially anti-white discrimination designed to push ethnics and immigrants onto employers.

2007 U.S. census studies revealed that the majority of white Americans aged 40 and under were non-white.

Nowhere better illustrates the perils of mass immigration than California, where an estimated 13.1 million of its inhabitants are Hispanic.

According to a 2006 Administration for Children and Families report, California had 449,200 families in California registered as receiving welfare. The figures revealed that 50.9 percent were Hispanic. A further 20.7 percent were black, 0.4 percent Native American, 4.6 percent Asian, 0.6 percent Hawaiian, and 0.4 percent “multiracial.”

This means that 78 percent of all welfare recipients in California were of non-white origin.

In 2008, the US Census Bureau released records which revealed that by 2042 whites in America would officially be a minority.

This mirrors the situation here in Britain, where figures from the Office of National Statistics indicate that whites would be a minority by 2066.

White people in Britain and America literally face extinction. The only hope of survival is that decent patriotic people stand up and elect good men and women to office to stop this colonisation process.

In Britain, we are lucky to have the British National Party fighting for the interests of the British people. Please do your part in the fight and support us.

Wednesday, 8 December 2010

Employers Now Forced To Choose Minorities Over Whites

The Equality Act, effective from April 2011 will push anti-white “positive action” guidelines and is to punish employers who do not discriminate in favour of choosing ethnic minorities, transgender and homosexuals for employment.

The Equalities Minister, Lynne Featherstone announced last week the implementation of the anti-white legislation and it was revealed that employers who do not discriminate sufficiently against whites in favour of minorities and homosexuals would be ‘named and shamed’.

Positive action, which is in effect positive discrimination means that an employer who, when faced with two applicants for a job who are equally qualified, would be expected to award that job to the ethnic over the white applicant.

The positive action guideline is part of the Lib-Con coalition Equality Strategy designed to increase numbers of ethnic minorities and homosexuals at work, schools, the public service and the health service.

The strategy includes:

• Guidelines to help companies make workplaces "gay friendly". These will be based on forthcoming research showing why companies find it difficult to create a culture where homosexuals are made to feel welcome and valued.

• Broader efforts to promote equal rights for homosexuals, including plans to allow same-sex couples to register their civil partnerships in churches. Ministers will also champion the rights of same-sex couples abroad, and work to tackle antagonism towards homosexuals in sport and in school playgrounds. Efforts will be made to recruit more homosexuals to stand for Parliament.

Speaking about the Equalities Act, Lynne Featherstone said ‘It is about giving employers the choice to make their workforce more diverse.’

The notion of giving employers ‘choice’ was shown to be a sham when Featherstone, speaking at London Docklands, revealed that if the ‘named and shamed’ policy doesn’t force employers to enforce the anti-white guidelines in favouring minority groups, ministers would consider tougher action “including a mandatory approach”.

Under the Equalities Act employers’ decisions on choosing applicants could subject them to increasing legal action for unfair discrimination by rejected minority and homosexual candidates.

The British National Party would repeal all politically correct laws that serve to discriminate against whites. The Equality Act and Race Relations Act are two pieces of anti-white legislation that the BNP would repeal immediately. The BNP believes that employers should have the absolute free choice when choosing job applicants without the interfering of politically correct politicians and government.

Monday, 6 December 2010

Anti 'Racist' Groups Threaten Election Process

The leader of the French Front National Mr Jean Marie Le Pen has been acquitted of ‘racism’ charges after far-left anti-racism group SOS Racism had accused Le Pen of inciting racial hatred.

Their aim was to imprison the 82 year old leader, illustrating the fact that unelected third party groups like SOS Racism and Searchlight are threatening the democratic process by bullying, intimidation and threats of violence.

The French case was heard earlier this week and related to the FN election campaign "No to Islamism" which featured a woman in a black face-covering Muslim veil next to a map of France covered in the Algerian flag.

SOS Racism did not like campaign material issued by the FN and they attempted to have its leader imprisoned.

This closely parallels the undemocratic attempts to imprison our own Chairman Nick Griffin on many occasions.

SOS Racism has spearheaded a campaign to deliberately force employers into accepting more minorities into their workforces. The SOS Racism campaign involves sending two identical work applications to a prospective employer. One application with a name of French origin and the other an immigrant name. This bullying strategy has led to many law suits for racial discrimination against employers in France.

SOS Racism is in many ways a parallel to the anti-democratic third party group Searchlight in the UK. Like Searchlight, SOS interferes with the electoral democratic process by deliberately swamping the electorate with publications that spew outright lies about candidates.

The SOS group also has major ties to the PS Socialist Party, again mirroring Searchlights close relationship with the Labour Party in the UK.
Searchlight is a far left, Zionist funded organisation that interferes in the democratic election process.

Political parties are bound by tight spending regulations on what a political party can and cannot spend during an election. Searchlight is not bound by these rules and they swamp wards and constituencies with outright lies against British National Party (BNP) candidates with no accountability or spending cap.

To this day the funding of Searchlight remains unknown. Political parties are regulated by law and have to publish the details of any significant funding/donor income. Searchlight can interfere in the election process, spend what they desire with no cap, and still not have to account for their income even though they directly interfere in the election process.

United Against Fascism (UAF) who have extremely close ties with Searchlight have been involved in organised violence against BNP members, including attacks on a BNP members property and a claw hammer attack. Many of its activists have been arrested by the Police.

The BNP would like to ask the Electoral Commission why third party groups like Searchlight are tolerated with no accountability whatsoever, but are allowed to campaign in election contests without a cap on spending, the need to explain their funding sources or justify the outright falsehoods they spread.

Friday, 3 December 2010

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Bigger than in Pakistan

The colonisation of Britain by Islam is reflected in the dramatic growth in shariah law schools and courts, but nowhere better illustrated by the fact that the Islamic banking sector in this country is now bigger than in Pakistan.

The UK has five shariah-compliant banks which offer discriminatory no-interest transactions to Muslims — while British people face increasing interest burdens on banking transactions.

Recently, the International Financial Services London revealed that Britain’s Islamic banking sector is bigger than that of Pakistan.

There are also 55 colleges and professional institutions which offer education in Islamic finance, more than anywhere else in the world.

The growth of Islamic finance has been helped in recent years by the Government. The Government has extended discriminatory tax relief on shariah-compliant mortgages to companies.

These tax reliefs completely discriminate against the British non-Muslim population, who receive no such benefits.

As if these facts were not evidence enough of the spread of Islam in Britain, other statistics dealing with the growth of Islamic schools, Muslim birth rates and increasing numbers of shariah courts have accentuated the colonisation of our country.

For example, figures released by the Department of Education and Skills there around 126 Muslim schools in Britain.

The think tank ‘Policy Exchange’ has recently warned that Muslim schools were allowing militant Jihadists to indoctrinate young Muslims, while the BBC programme Panorama came under fire recently for exposing anti-Semitic and shariah law teachings at Muslim Schools across Britain.

Many Islamic schools insist that girls wear the burka or a full headscarf and veil known as the niqab.

Earlier this year, statistics from the Office for National Statistics revealed that Mohammad was the most popular boy’s name in Britain, another sure sign of the huge racial demographic change occurring in Britain today.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the decades-old Sacred Heart School in Blackburn was to be handed over to Blackburn’s Tauheedul mosque and re-opened with a new name after the number of Muslim pupils rocketed from just 7 percent in 2000 to 97 percent last year.

Last year, think-tank Civitas revealed that there were at least 85 shariah courts operating in Britain, but added that the number could be significantly higher.

Shariah law allows the beating and enslavement of women, the punishment of rape victims and in some extreme cases, the killing of non-Muslims,

In contrast to all the other political parties, the British National Party is the only organisation dedicated to preventing the colonisation of Britain by Islam.

The BNP would address the core of the issue, which is massive Third World immigration, first. Once steps have been taken to ensure that the indigenous British population remains the majority population of this nation, then a BNP government would take steps to prevent all the outward manifestations of Islamic colonisation.

These steps will include a halt to the discriminatory Islamic banking industry, to which the Labour and Tory regimes have pandered by issuing tax reliefs on Islamic mortgages while the indigenous British people receive no help at all.

The BNP will also prevent the existence of Islamic schools within Britain. They are a breeding ground for militant Islam which educates young Muslims to recognise the second class ‘dhimmi’ status of non-Muslims.

The BNP will also prevent the establishment of shariah courts in Britain. British law should be the only law system recognised in our country.

In short, Britain has a choice: be overrun by Islam and the Third World, or vote in a British National Party government. The choice is as clear as it is simple.

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Hobbits are Racist if they are White

If you thought the politically correct brigade could get no worse – you were wrong.

A casting agent for the movie The Hobbit was sacked after placing advertisements seeking extras with "light skin tones".

A Pakistani woman was rejected for the role as her skin complexion did not match the general hobbit appearance.

This seems sensible to all normal thinking people when you consider that Fallohide Hobbits are pale skinned.

Not so for the politically correct anti-white brigade. The innocent casting agent was sacked from their job and the justifying cry of ‘racism’ was heard from the media and the PC movement.

Either way, the fact that the hammer of ‘racism’ invades even the artistic rights of casting agents for very specific roles illustrates how crazy the anti-white brigade has become.

Monday, 29 November 2010

View this Morning

On a more lighthearted and less political note, here is the view we woke up to this morning.

Friday, 26 November 2010

Immigration Leads to Death Epidemic in UK and Europe

The British National Party’s opposition to mass Third World immigration has been vindicated with the release of statistics which show that 63 percent of all new HIV cases in 2009 were black Africans.

In addition, the figures, released by the Health Protection Agency, also revealed that 68 percent of HIV sufferers acquired their infection abroad, mostly from sub-Saharan Africa.

According to official statistics, which the BNP disputes as inaccurate, blacks make up approximately 2 percent of the UK population.

Other statistics revealed that 42 percent of all newly diagnosed cases of HIV were a result of homosexual activity.

The Health Protection Agency estimates that around one third more people are undiagnosed. This means that if 6630 were diagnosed with having HIV during 2009, the actual figure is likely to be around 8000.

HIV/AIDS treatment costs the National Health Service (i.e. the taxpayer) £21.8 million in direct costs, which is known as the Aids Support Grant.

It is therefore inevitable that the number of Aids cases will only rise further, particularly given the recent forecast made by Oxford demography Professor David Coleman, based on Office for National Statistics reports, that Britain will be a white minority country by 2066.

In 2008, the EU Committee on Migration, Refugees and Population estimated that around 2 to 4 million Africans “emigrate” from sub-Saharan Africa every year.

According to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), 19 percent of all reported HIV infections during 2008 originated from sub-Saharan Africa.

Of the 318,233 HIV infections diagnosed in Western Europe by the end of 2008, 35 percent were contracted through homosexual activity, the ECDC figures showed.

Some 42 percent of cases were contracted through heterosexual contact. This figure actually compromises the 19 percent of infections which originated from sub-Saharan Africa.

The BNP believes that only a complete halt, and reversal, of mass Third World immigration will halt this trend.

Monday, 22 November 2010

EHRC Has Spent £25 Million in Three Years on “Equalities” Swindles

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has spent at least £25 million of its £210 million taxpayer-funded budget over the last three years on organisations promoting lesbian, homosexual, transgender, refugee, black, and ethnic interests – but nothing on heterosexual white British people.

A British National Party investigation into the EHRC’s budget has revealed that the astonishing outlays by the EHRC, which include huge sums to organisations that are blatantly only for nonwhites, come at a time when British people struggle to cope with rising unemployment, redundancies and cuts in critical public services.

Here are just a few examples of the projects funded by the EHRC over the past three years, and the amounts given:

Derbyshire Friend Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender LGBT £393,200
The Lesbian Gay Foundation LGF £264,789
The Runnymede Trust Promoting MultiEthnic Britain £235,000
Preston Western Lancashire Racial Equality Council £225,775
Barking and Dagenham Racial Equality Council £210,000
Preston W. Lancs Racial Equality Council £123,500
EACH Ethnic Alcohol Counselling in Hounslow £120,000
London Discrimination Unit £120,000
Ethnic Minorities Law Centre £90,000
Race Equality Action for Lewisham (REAL) £79,600
Ethnic Minorities Law Centre £78,000
Tameside Racial Equality Council Ltd.The Equality and Diversity Centre £78,000
Leeds Racial Equality Council £74,000
Bristol Lesbian Gay Bisexual Forum £70,000
Peterborough Race Equality Council £66,000
Hounslow Racial Equality Council £65,500
Haringey Racial Equality Council £57,000
Oldham Race Equality Partnership £45,000
Bolton Racial Equality Council £40,000
Ealing Racial Equality Council £40,000
Enfield Racial Equality Council £40,000
Hounslow Racial Equality Council £40,000
Kingston Racial Equality Council £40,000
Multi ethnic Aberdeen Limited £ £40,000
Northamptonshire Racial Equality Council £40,000
Oxfordshire Racial Equality Council £40,000
The Lesbian and Gay Foundation £39,818
Bexley Council for Racial Equality £38,000
Bedford Racial Equality Council £38,000
North West Kent Racial Equality Council £38,000
Slough Race Equality Council £37,600
Bury Metro Racial Equality Council £37,500
North of England Refugee Service £37,500
All Wales Ethnic Minority Association AWEMA £35,000
Bath North East Somerset Racial Equality Council £35,000
Black Minority Ethnic Carers Support Service £35,000
Black Training and Enterprise Group BTEG £35,000
Centre for Equality and Diversity £35,000
Consortium of Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender voluntary and Community Organisations £35,000
Cultural CoOperation £35,000
East Staffordshire Racial Equality Council £35,000
Furness Multicultural Community Forum £35,000
Greenwich Council for Racial Equality £35,000
Hillingdon Race Equality Council LTD £35,000
Kirklees Racial Equality Council £35,000
Medway Racial Equality Council £35,000
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Racial Equality Council £35,000
Plymouth and District Racial Equality Council £35,000
Rotherham Ethnic Minority Alliance REMA £35,000
The Black and Minority Ethnic Young Peoples Project BMEYPP £35,000
Ipswich and Suffolk Council For Racial Equality £32,100
Essex Racial Equality Council £31,200
Rights and Equality West Midlands £30,000
SexYOUality £30,000
Harrow Council For Racial Equality £29,300
MOSAIC Black Mixed Parentage Family Group £28,126
DHIVERSE £28,056
Haringey Racial Equality Council £27,835
Hammersmith Fulham Black Minority £26,245
Ethnic Network HF BMEN £26,245
Black Community Development Project £25,000
Pakistan Community Association and Multicultural Advice Centre £20,060
North Yorkshire Black and Minority Ethnic Strategy Board £17,800

Meanwhile, white British people have to bear the brunt of massive cuts to their frontline services, and crucial public services such as the police and National Health Service have been seriously affected.

The Greater Manchester Police Authority (GMPA) have been told to cut £134 million from its budget and are preparing to cut 3,000 jobs as a result. An estimated 1,387 officers 1,557 civilian posts will be axed due to the cuts leaving Greater Manchester without a major frontline policing operation.

The ConDems regime is also planning to axe 27,000 nurses from the NHS, which will result in increased waiting lists putting vulnerable people at risk, many of whom are still waiting for operations.

The BNP is appalled that as the British people struggle through the recession, suffer rising unemployment, forced redundancies, and cuts in public services, the EHRC can consume £210 million of taxpayer's money in the three years since 2007.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the EHRC gave severance pay amounting to £629,276 to seven staff members — and then immediately rehired them at a cost of £338,708.

The BNP reiterates its pledge to abolish groups like the EHRC and stop the criminal waste of taxpayer's money on politically correct projects.

Monday, 15 November 2010

Ban Halal Slaughter Now

Earlier this year Exova, a leading testing and advisory service that seeks to ensure high standards of food quality for consumers announced that it would join forces with Halal meat expert Nizar Boga (from the London's Islamic Cultural Centre) to launch a new halal accreditation and inspection service called The Universal Halal Agency.

The Islamic Cultural Centre boasts of having an 'Interfaith' department which provides:

"training for Non-Muslim Professionals, consultation with Government/Non Government organisations on Race Relations, meetings with the Metropolitan Police on Race relations, lectures and conferences on Islam in Universities, colleges, schools, Churches and Synagogues etc."

Aside from the wasteful resources involved in having our police officers attend these multi-faith and Islamic lectures, what is also alarming is that Nizar Boga, Exova, The Universal Halal Agency and an assortment of media liberals think that it is the accreditation/certification of Islamic foods that is the problem.

No, the problem is Halal food full stop!

The alarming news over the last few months that Halal food has been served in schools, hospitals, fast food chains and public houses all over the UK has reiterated the need for decent people to vocally oppose this barbaric slaughter of animals.

What the media have on occasion tried to do is deflect the issue from one of Islamic barbarism to merely accreditation of foods and consumer rights, whereas the real issue is that such practises are utterly alien to our traditions.

British Veterinary Association (BVA) has called for Halal slaughter to be banned as it causes ‘intolerable cruelty’.

Daily Mail Reporter Danny Penman illustrated the barbarity of this procedure:

"When I step inside, the first thing that hits me is the overpowering stench — a nasty, fatty smell that sticks in the throat.

And then there’s the noise of ¬machinery, interspersed with bleating animals and the slaughtermen ¬uttering prayers.

Hundreds of sheep and lambs are penned up in tiny stalls. From time to time, one tries — and fails — to escape by leaping over the bars of its pen. But then the same would be true of any abattoir.

It is only when it comes to the actual slaughter that the differences become apparent. I watch — and secretly film — as the animals are herded onto a ¬conveyor belt that leads them to the slaughterman, who is wearing a blue hairnet over his hair and beard in ¬accordance with hygiene requirements.

Grabbing one lamb at a time, he pulls back its head and slits the throat with a swift movement from his razor-sharp knife.

Blood gushes everywhere as he recites the Islamic Bismillah prayer in Arabic: ‘In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful." Danny Penman.

Thank god the British National Party stands for common sense and the banning of the ritual slaughter of animals without pre-stunning, and the sale of such meat.

Britain has always prided itself and has a long tradition of ensuring the least possible distress to animals.

There is of course a very easy answer to the problem. If Muslims have to practise Halal slaughter then go and practise it in any number of Islamic countries. Just don't do it in Britain.

Friday, 5 November 2010

Tube Strike - Good Move or Trade Union Class War Tactics?

The Tube strike is in response to London Undergrounds move to cut 800 posts in ticket offices and general back-office management functions.

Tube workers are opposing these cuts and RMT General Secretary Bob Crow has attested that the strike is about safety. This is on the basis that ticket office staff are trained in health and safety protocol and are able to deal with an emergency such as an evacuation.

It is expected that the strike is disrupting millions of commuters and London businesses. It is also expected that such a strike will cost businesses in London millions of pounds.

Is the Strike Justified?

It is the right of employees to organise collectively when faced with work conditions that are unacceptable. It is the right of employees to organise when faced with job losses that could easily be avoided. These are the founding principles of Unionism.

Militant Trade Unionism = Marxism

Sadly for British workers, they have no course of action against such proposed cuts which are a result of a credit-based economy rather than any notion of employer abuse.

London Underground workers are represented by the scourge of Marxist creations in the form of Class War Trade Unions.

The objective of the Trade Union Movement was originally for disaffected workers to defend their workplace rights against employers who would abuse their power.

Originally, Unions were almost wholly industry specific, such as the mid-Victorian Amalgamated Society of Engineers. Ultimately, what was created was an amalgamation of Unions into major unified bodies such as the Trades Union Congress (TUC).

Trade Unions = Class War

The inevitable direction of militant Trade Unionism is class war. Trade Unions seek the membership of high numbers of workers from the respective industries on the premise that they can represent their rights. They then force those workers into an 'us' and 'them' mentality against both the presiding government of the day and the middle and upper classes in general who generally represent the employer demographic.

Marxist Unions were always aware that the inevitable hardship workers would feel (as the Unions used them as class war cannon fodder) should merely reiterate the rightfulness of their cause and imbue the workers with objective confirmation that their cause is right.

The Unions led by militant Marxists for well over half a century have used their position to wage a war of destabilising the economy in order to propagate social unrest amongst the class they claim to represent.

During the Cold War the purpose was very clear; to inflict as much damage to the Western economy as is possible to allow for the introduction of Marxist economic principles.

The Unions failed. Once the doctrine of Marxist economics had failed to manifest, they, the Unions, could always fall back on the Marxist notion of 'equality of man'. When we consider that a number of the Marxist agitators became leaders within the Labour Party, the Marxists were fighting the same war on different fronts.

Indeed, the Marxists became 'corrupted' through financial benefits as they led both the Labour Party and the Trade Unions which were both seemingly in-exhaustive sources of financial dividends.

Marxist Greed and Equality of Man

This very un-Marxist greed for riches led the Marxists to fall back on the Marxist notion of 'equality of man', thus all the Unions delight in donating large sums of worker membership monies into anti-British causes and investing copious amounts of time engaging in politically correct campaigns demanding equality for black, lesbian and homosexual workers. At the same time, they are still invested in the political process enough to support and somewhat control the Labour Party and oppose anything that manifests itself as healthy and patriotic such as the British National Party.

Finally, Trade Unions fail, or refuse to recognise that credit-based economies, in conjunction with globalisation, is behind the economic hardships that British workers face. Trade Unions support globalisation and multi-culturalism and thus they support the exportation of British jobs to third world nations and the deprivation of the right to work for British workers.

Trade Unions now work hand in hand with the State as their relationship is mutually beneficial. Trade Unions dictate the Labour Party position and the Labour Party provide legislative recognition of the Unions within the various industries. One hand feeds the other and therefore workers rights are never really represented.

Unions - No Place in a Healthy Britain

In truth, all Unions are merely a symptom of a society that has decayed to such an extent that class has become the dominant and dividing feature of the nation. Class division and Trade Unionism is a social evil and has no place in a society that respects all industry sectors and recognises their respective merits for the benefit of the nation as a whole.

Sunday, 31 October 2010

UK Border Agency Report Confirms Immigrants Steal Lower Paid Jobs from British People

For years we have heard from the Lib-Lab-Con politicians that Britain needs immigrant labour to survive, especially in highly skilled occupations such as health care.

This claim was utterly rubbished as the UK Border Agency published its report 'International group, point-based system Tier 1: an operational assessment', revealing that a third of so-called 'highly skilled' immigration to the UK works in lower skilled jobs.

Their study revealed that 29 per cent of skilled workers were working in unskilled occupations and 25 per cent in skilled jobs. More worryingly, 46 percent of immigrant 'highly skilled' labour included immigrants who had not, or would not disclose their work status.

Unemployment in Britain currently stands at around 2.45 million according to the Office for National Statistics.

The fact that 1 in 3 highly skilled immigrants work in lower-skilled jobs means that immigrants are taking jobs that could easily be filled by British people. This is nothing short of a national disgrace when we consider the financial hardships that our own people are facing due to high unemployment.

Under current regulations, highly skilled workers (Tier 1) are issued visas based on their qualifications and previous wage rate and do not require a permanent job offer to enter and come into the UK.

This means that immigrants can easily enter Britain through the Tier 1 system and once resident they can enter the low skilled job markets and thus deprive thousands of British people the chance to work.

We should be supporting our own people's needs above the needs of immigrants who are entering Britain to simply take British jobs away from British people and drive down wages and thus causing further financial hardship for our already struggling people.

UK Border Agency to Stop Patrolling Key Ports

In related news, the UK Border Agency has announced that it is to cut funding for the Ports Unit on November 23 which covers Stranraer and Cairnryan.

According to figures obtained by the Dumfries and Galloway Standard since April 2007 900 illegal immigrants from China, Pakistan, Iraq and Ecuador have been stopped entering the UK through the region; 222 of those were reported for criminal matters.

18 cases of illegal immigrant facilitation or people trafficking have been discovered; 424 cases of drugs possession have also been uncovered.

The police figures show that one case in particular concerned a female illegal immigrant from Bolivia who was caught with cocaine that had a street value of £350,000.

Such cuts will allow untold numbers of immigrants to enter the UK with relative ease and allow the importing of drugs into the UK.

Issues of national security such as border control should be one of the highest priorities for any government with the best interests of this country at heart.

The UK Border Agency should be expanded with increased funding by money saved through the immediate withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan. We should then place our soldiers at all UK borders to further halt the immigrant invasion.

Friday, 29 October 2010

Left Wing 'Institute of Race Relations' Concludes 'Racist' UK policies blamed for deaths of 77 asylum seekers and migrants.

According to the IRR racist UK policies on asylum and immigration are to blame for at least 77 deaths of asylum seekers and immigrants.

This dubious figure is generally composed of the following:

•Twenty Eight are reported by the IRR to be suspected or known to have taken their own lives after their asylum claims had been turned down.
•Seven are due to their being denied health care for "preventable medical problems".
•Seven have died in prison custody.
•Fifteen are said to have died during "highly risky" attempts to enter the country.

According to the report "hundreds if not thousands" of people had perished making desperate journeys to the UK, as stowaways on planes, lorries and ships.

This is a typically hysterical left wing report by a think-tank funded originally by injections of money from the Greater London Council, Socialist Channel4, and other organisations and individuals with a very Marxist-Race agenda.

In truth, we should be looking at the reasons as to why 5,706 of our people committed suicide in 2008.

We should be looking at the death rate amongst our own people, in particular the elderly. According to the Office of National Statistics during the winter seasons of 2008/09 there were 29,400 more deaths among those aged 75 and over, compared with levels in the non-winter period.

These figures are a national disgrace, and still the Lib-Con 2010 Budget hit pensioners hardest due to the rise in VAT to 20pc. Thus, already financially stretched pensioners will feel the cold of the winter more than ever.

We should be looking at the reasons behind the ever-increasing overpopulation of young offender prisons.

As for the fifteen who have died during "highly risky" attempts to enter the country, would not a suitable answer to this problem be to declare war on human trafficking and make the criminals within this evil industry pay for the evils they inflict on both the immigrants and the countries forced to endure the ramifications of their criminal enterprise.

Bodies like the IRR should be abolished and declared a criminal waste of taxpayer's money. They serve no purpose other than to bludgeon our institutions to death with the anti-white hammer of alleged racism.

Thursday, 28 October 2010

Mohammed is the most popular boys' name in Britain according to the Office for National Statistics

The Office for National Statistics has reported that the name Mohammed collectively combined with all its spelling variations makes it the most popular name for newborn babies in Britain today.

Alarmingly it is the most common boys name in the West Midlands and the fourth most popular in London according to 2009 statistics.

Dr Justin Gest, an academic at Harvard and the London School of Economics and author of Apart: Alienated and Engaged Muslims in the West, said that its popularity was "symbolic of Britain's diversity."

According to a quote from the Daily Mail Published on October 28th 2010 Dr Gest said:

"Where we had many Johns and Jacks we also have plenty of Mohammeds now."

"Muslims see Mohammed as "a paragon of excellence" and seek to emulate his life and follow his guidance, making the name an obvious choice for parents."

Dr Gest is typical of the liberal intellectual elite that runs our current high education system, and they share a collective blame as to why young people going through the educational system are socially warped.

Whereas normal people are aghast to learn that Mohammed is one of the most popular names in the UK, Gest and the various fawning liberal intellectuals applaud.

Whereas normal people with any knowledge of Mohammed's life are appalled by Mohammed's activities the liberal elite again applaud.

The Prophet Mohammed was a paedophile and this is now almost universally accepted. The 'Hadith collection' considered extremely reliable by Muslims had this to say with regards to Mohammed's illicit activities with a child:

Sahih Bukhari: Narrated Hisham's father:

Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old. (Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236)

The word 'consumed' is most important here as it refers to the consummation of the marriage between Mohammed and the nine year old girl.

Dr Gest may view these name statistics as applaudable and "symbolic of Britain's diversity."

Decent people deplore these statistics as increasing evidence of the Islamification of the UK.

Saturday, 23 October 2010

Radio Red, White and Blue new Euro File Show

Radio Red White and Blue has just posted up the latest issue of its “Eurofile” programme which outlines the work of party researchers who support the MEPs in their voting decisions.

The half hour show features two of the researchers, the recently-appointed David Hannam and Radio RWB’s own John Walker, discussing how decisions are made as to how the British National Party’s MEPs are advised to vote on the huge number of resolutions and motions which come before the parliament.

Go to the below address to listen to this fascinating interview in full, and then click on the RWB player launch button.


Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Helping Banana Exporting Countries - EU Madness

I have been working with John Walker recently on this week's voting recommendations for our MEPs Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons.

There are literally so many votes and amendments that it is essential to have a team providing our MEPs with the best possible information as they would be physically unable to undertake the task alone. This especially applies to our Chairman Nick Griffin who has a very hectic party schedule.

One motion in particular struck myself and John as illustrative of EU disregard for European and UK money.

The Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) for The African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) is a motion whereby it is proposed that European and inevitably UK money will be used to prop up third world economies by investing €200 million to 10 ACP countries for four years.

The aim of BAM is to help areas dependent on banana exports to adjust to the pressures of globalisation, by improving competitiveness and promoting the economic diversification of banana-dependent areas.

Under current EU budget proposals the UK will during 2011 make a contribution of £9.5billion to the EU.

Some of this hard earned taxpayers money will ultimately go to Third World countries in order to prop up their economies. This is done under the false pretence that somehow this will encourage these Third World nations to undertake 'economic diversification' in order to resolve their heavily one export trade culture. In truth, no such outcome is remotely possible.

So there you have it, at a time of great recession in the UK and across Europe, our political masters don't announce cut backs but actually increase the UK contribution to the EU and at the same time propose to increase funding to Third World countries.

Mutual trade amongst our European brethren is absolutely good and where it is reciprocally beneficial it should be encouraged. However, to think that injecting UK and European taxpayers money into underdeveloped nations is viable or even ethically right is ludicrous.

We should over a period of time reduce our contribution to the EU, increase mutual trade with reciprocally benefiting European nations, ultimately withdraw from the EU and of course bring a complete stop to UK taxpayers money going to any destination other than straight back into the UK.

Monday, 18 October 2010

"English Defence League is a bigger threat than the BNP," says MP for Dagenham and Rainham

Jon Cruddas, MP for Dagenham and Rainham, wrote in the Observer on October 10th 2010 that the "English Defence League is a bigger threat than the BNP."

Aside from the general hysterical tone you would expect to hear from a weak minded liberal opposing anything that might actually represent a population-opinion uprising, his comments are somewhat accurate and inaccurate.

Cruddas goes on to state, "The EDL is a much bigger threat than the BNP, consumed by infighting and debt since its crushing defeat in May’s local elections. It also poses the biggest danger to community cohesion in Britain today. Its provocative marches, "flash demos" and pickets are designed to whip up divisions between communities and provoke a violent reaction from young British Muslims."

The game here is quite obvious.

Firstly, it is a generally considered opinion amongst the more experienced figures of nationalist politics that the EDL certainly have all the traits of being a state-sponsored organisation. Understand, however, that there is a difference between state-sponsored and state-led; the latter being that the organisation is run by the state at the very highest ladder of its leadership, and the more likely former scenario where the organisation is merely helped along by the state. Initial injections of cash, favourable media press and general organisational skills reflecting a more mature entity are all signs of state-sponsoring to some degree, especially for a group as embryonic as the EDL.

Secondly, what is the general objective of this group?

1. To attract the more militant recruit
2. To increase intelligence on these individuals accordingly
3. To allow them the opportunity to provoke real skirmishes between the white and Muslim communities.
4. Finally, upon the inevitable war with Iran, to act fairly by stamping down on the militant tendencies of both communities, but mainly to prove fairness to the Muslim community and at the same time present to the general public a negative stereotype of both sides as trouble causers. To some extent the stereotype will 'brush off' on the BNP, but for a change the BNP is not the real target here.

The EDL is, therefore, certainly a bigger threat in terms of the inevitable carnage on the streets of Britain that will occur when the militant members of the Muslim community actually respond.

When this happens Jon Cruddas will be the first to condemn the situation. He will use it as another weak excuse to bash genuinely concerned Briton’s over the head with every Marxist inspired anti-white word he and the rest of his treacherous gang can think of, when in truth the whole situation has been somewhat engineered to provide a green light for the invasion of Iran.

It would be foolish to suppose that the EDL are wholly ‘misdirected’ and that all their supporters are equally the same. They do represent a growing feeling of anger levied against the Islamification of Britain. If the nationalist movement is to succeed it must make contact with the voting population to a greater extent than just contesting elections. Community politics is the key and this is where the EDL will fall short, whereas on the other hand, as the BNP moves into more sophisticated political ground and finely tunes its community politics we will find ourselves more ready to capitalise in real political terms on the disintegrating situation.

The standard recruit to the EDL is not interested in BNP community politics but the quick fix demonstration. The latter does not solve anything and only real community politics can make a difference. It is the harder and longer road but it remains the right road.